Summer Ops Bill Advances in Senate

443 view(s)

Publish Date

07/15/2011

SAM Magazine-Washington, D.C., July 15, 2011- The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee unanimously recommended passage of the Ski Area Recreation Opportunity Enhancement Act of 2011, which would amend the National Forest Ski Area Permit Act of 1986 to explicitly allow a much wider array of winter and summer activities within resort permit areas.

The 1986 law explicitly allows only alpine and Nordic skiing. Snowboarding and mountain biking, while widely approved on Forest Service land, are not mentioned in the existing law. The Forest Service has frequently allowed these activities because they use the same facilities-lifts and trails-as alpine and Nordic skiing, and thus require little or no additional development.

However, many other potential summer uses have been in limbo. "The Forest Service was having a hard time approving [additional uses]," Jerry Blann, president of Jackson Hole ski area and a member of the NSAA public lands committee, told the Jackson Hole Daily. "They're somewhat frustrated themselves."

Senate sponsors of the summer operations bill include Mark Udall, D-Colo., Mike Enzi, R-Utah, and John Barasso, R-Wyo. A companion bill in the House of Representatives is sponsored by Diana DeGette, D-Colo., Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.

Similar bills were introduced into the previous session of Congress. They received bipartisan support and were incorporated into an omnibus public lands bill, but that bill never came up for a vote. The legislative process began again during the current session of Congress when the bills were re-introduced last winter.

Comments

Downsides ?

Expanding summer ops might bring in additional revenues but sometimes they can cut into valuable downtime when maintenance operations are performed to prepare for the winter season. Less time to work means less work can be done ? The trickle down theory is very slow for folks who make a living working on ski slopes.

Good stuff, I hope?

This should allow for more revenue for the ski area operators and hopefully that will trickle down to better operated ski resorts with more services in the future for skiers. Then again the last "trickle down" theory (voodoo economics-George Bush SR) just ended up putting more money in fewer pockets in the end...?

I really hope my beloved ski area does not now become one large circus arena.

Congratulations Public Lands Committee

Congrats Jerry and Committee members. This is long overdue. As planners all over the place, we have been continually frustrated by designing and implementing an alpine slide or bike park in Area A and then seeing same facilities disallowed at Area B. Did not realize that Snowboarding was not really allowed by the 1986 bill. I guess Onno knew that though. Paul

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.